Saturday, 11 March 2017

Jews Keeping America Weak: Rules for Radicals by (((Saul D. Alinsky)))

Having been persuaded by (((Cynthia Ozick))) of the authenticity, truth and veracity of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a publication I had heretofore but erroneously believed to be an anti-Semitic forgery and hoax, I initiated research that would allow me to comprehend more fully the vile and secret Jewish conspiracy for world domination. And before my Jewish readers get their yarmulkes in a knot over me citing (((Miss Ozick’s))) revelatory review of the Protocols, preparing no doubt to overwhelm her and I both with the routine condemnatory messages for which they are renowned, for the poor woman, eighty-eight years of age no less, is nowadays the recipient of not inconsiderable Kike disapprobation over her views on this, let me remind everyone, Jew and goyim alike, of her Hymie bona fides; people have been calling her ‘Christ killer’ since she was a toddler, she has been shamed for refusing to sing Christmas carols since her school days, and is the author of, among other works, All the World Wants the Jews Dead. She is the real sheeny deal, so when she says the plan outlined in the Protocols is legitimate, then I for one sit up and take note. Right, with that out of the way, let’s begin.

One of the most remarkable deceptions in the repository of twentieth century duplicity, a century replete with mendacity, was that Hebes were incapable of conspiring to rule the world because of the Holocaust (otherwise known as the Shoah). Or in other words; an argument based on a premise that victims are incapable of scheming. This is like asserting that those favourably disposed towards Nazism today are incapable of conspiring against the Yid because of the ‘punch a Nazi’ movement (otherwise known as liberalism). The astonishingly durable Jewish sermon on Kike victimisation, from Hitler to German ovens, withering of late, but still potent in some circles, simply facilitated the implementation, in plain sight, of almost all the 24 protocols, from the Basic Doctrine (I) to Qualities of the Ruler (XXIV). A more cynical man than I might conclude the Shoah expedited, or at least camouflaged, Jewish actions to enslave the gentile. Whether that’s true or not can be left for another day, but what is indisputable is that in America, where the Yid has excelled beyond his wildest imagination, Jews Keeping America Weak (J-KAW) have played a pivotal role. And, like elsewhere, it has remained virtually unknown despite operating in, and I say this again, plain view.
❖❖❖

Perspicacious readers may well be asking what all this has to do with (((Alinsky))). I’m glad you asked. It’s a simple as this: (((Alinsky’s))) Rules for Radicals is a direct continuation of the Jewish conspiracy chartered in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, modified, tried and tested on American soil from the 1930s onwards. Let’s take but one example (chosen here so as to draw attention to (((Alinsky’s))) rules of ethics of means and ends, and not his more well-known 12 Rules).

In Protocol I, “Basic Doctrine,” the Elders of Zion state, “The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule must have resource both to cunning and to make-believe. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the goyim, but we must in no wise be guided by them. Our right lies in force. The word “right” is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you” (p. 24).

And from Protocol III, “Methods of Conquest”: “We appear on the scene as alleged saviours of the worker from this oppression when we propose to him to enter the ranks of our fighting forces – Socialists, Anarchists, Communists – to whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our social masonry” (p. 31).

Now let us turn to Rules for Radicals (the chapter titled “Of Means and Ends”):

“The end is what you want, and the means is how you get it. Whenever we think about social change, the question of means and ends arises. The man of action views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms. He has no other problem; he thinks only of his actual resources and the possibilities of various choices of action. He asks of ends only whether they are achievable and worth the cost; of means, only whether they will work. To say that corrupt means corrupt the ends is to believe in the immaculate conception of end and principles. The real arena is corrupt and bloody” (p. 24).

“The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive – but real – allies of the Haves… The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means... The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be” (pp. 25-26).

“The third rule of ethics of means and ends is that in war the end justifies almost any means” (p. 29).

“The tenth rule of the ethics of means and ends is that you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments” (p. 36).

❖❖❖

Well, you can see for yourself; they're more or less identical. Not word-for-word, but in the basic ideas and tone. (((Alinsky))) was a second generation elder of Zion.

As gentiles fought to mythologise the Protocols, ridiculing and endeavouring to destroy the reputations of those for whom the truth was palpable, the Jew (((Alinsky))) was, in plain sight, rewriting them for popular leftist consumption. Jews have been keeping America weak since the late 1800s, but no other sheeny has been, individually, as successful as (((Saul David Alinsky))) in bringing the nation to its knees. 

The only question, the only one worth asking, is whether Trump's MAGA can withstand, and ultimately prevail over, (((Alinsky's))) J-KAW. 

No comments:

Post a Comment